Academy of European Law (Florence, Italy) (2007a) The fundamentals of EU law revisited: assessing the impact of the constitutional debate. Edited by C. Barnard. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: https://academic.oup.com/book/2907.
Academy of European Law (Florence, Italy) (2007b) The fundamentals of EU law revisited: assessing the impact of the constitutional debate. Edited by C. Barnard. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: https://academic.oup.com/book/2907.
Accetto, M. and Zleptnig, S. (2005a) ‘The Principle of Effectiveness: Rethinking Its Role in Community Law’, European Public Law, 11(3), pp. 375–403. Available at: https://kluwerlawonline-com.ezproxy.sussex.ac.uk/JournalArticle/European+Public+Law/11.3/EURO2005030.
Accetto, M. and Zleptnig, S. (2005b) ‘The Principle of Effectiveness: Rethinking Its Role in Community Law’, European Public Law, 11(3), pp. 375–403. Available at: https://kluwerlawonline-com.ezproxy.sussex.ac.uk/JournalArticle/European+Public+Law/11.3/EURO2005030.
Adam Cygan (2000) ‘Defining a sufficiently serious breach of Community law: the House of Lords casts its net into the waters’, European Law Review, 25(4). Available at: http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.
Allott, P. (2000) ‘Preliminary rulings - another infant disease’, European Law Review, 25(5), pp. 538–547. Available at: http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.
Alston, P. and Weiler, J.H.H. (1998) ‘An “Ever  Closer  Union”  in  Need of  a  Human  Rights  Policy’, European Journal of International Law, 9, pp. 658–723. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/9.4.658.
Anagnostaras, G. (2002) ‘Not as unproblematic as you might think: the establishment of causation in governmental liability actions’, European Law Review (E.L. Rev.), 27(6), pp. 663–676. Available at: http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.
Anagnostaras, Georgios (2001) ‘State Liability and Alternative Courses of Action: How Independent Can an Autonomous Remedy Be?’, Yearbook of European Law, 21(1). Available at: http://search.proquest.com/docview/1564197331?OpenUrlRefId=info:xri/sid:primo&accountid=14182.
Anthony Arnull (2011) ‘The principle of effective judicial protection in EU law: an unruly horse?’, European Law Review, 36(1). Available at: http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.
Arnull, A. (2006) ‘Out with the old...’, European Law Review, 31(1), pp. 1–2. Available at: http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.
Arnull, A. (2010) ‘The Law Lords and the European Union: swimming with the incoming tide’, European Law Review, 35(1), pp. 57–87. Available at: http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.
Arnull, A., Barnard, C. and Dougan, M. (2011) Constitutional Order of States?: essays in EU law in honour of Alan Dashwood. Bloomsbury Publishing. Available at: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/suss/reader.action?docID=752471&ppg=274.
Avbelj, M. (2011) ‘Theory of European Union’, European Law Review, 36(6), pp. 818–836. Available at: http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.
Avbelj, M. (no date) ‘Supremacy or Primacy of EU Law-(Why) Does it Matter?’, European Law Journal, 17(6), pp. 744–763. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2011.00560.x.
Baker, E. and Harding, C. (no date) ‘From past imperfect to future perfect? A longitudinal study of the third pillar’, European Law Review, 34(1), pp. 25–54. Available at: http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.
Bale, T., Hanley, S. and Szczerbiak, A. (no date) ‘“May Contain Nuts”? The Reality behind the Rhetoric Surrounding the British Conservatives’ New Group in the European Parliament’, Political Quarterly, 81(1), pp. 85–98. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-923X.2009.02067.x.
Barber, N.W. (no date) ‘The Limited Modesty of Subsidiarity’, European Law Journal, 11(3), pp. 308–325. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2005.00261.x.
BARBER, T. (2010) ‘The Appointments of Herman van Rompuy and Catherine Ashton’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 48, pp. 55–67. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02093.x.
Barents, R. (2004) ‘Court of Justice in the Draft Constitution, The’, Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 11(2). Available at: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?page=121&handle=hein.journals%2Fmaastje11&collection=journals.
Barents, R. (2010) ‘The Court of Justice after the Treaty of Lisbon’, Common Market Law Review, 47(Issue 3), pp. 709–728. Available at: https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2010031.
Barnard, C. (ed.) (2007a) The Cambridge yearbook of European legal studies: Vol. 9: 2006-2007. Oxford: Hart Pub. Available at: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/suss/reader.action?docID=1772426&ppg=143.
Barnard, C. (ed.) (2007b) The Cambridge yearbook of European legal studies: Volume 9: 2006-2007. Oxford: Hart.
Barnard, C. (2016) The substantive law of the EU: the four freedoms. Fifth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Barnard, C. and Academy of European Law (2007a) The fundamentals of EU law revisited: assessing the impact of the constitutional debate. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199226221.001.0001/acprof-9780199226221.
Barnard, C. and Academy of European Law (2007b) The fundamentals of EU law revisited: assessing the impact of the constitutional debate. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199226221.001.0001/acprof-9780199226221.
Barnard, C. and Peers, S. (eds) (2017) European Union law. Second edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Barrett, G. (2008) ‘The king is dead, long live the king": the recasting by the Treaty of Lisbon of the provisions of the Constitutional Treaty concerning national parliaments’, European Law Review, 33(1), pp. 66–84. Available at: http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.
Beatson, J. and Tridimas, T. (eds) (1998a) New directions in European public law. Oxford: Hart Pub. Available at: http://suss.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=1772332.
Beatson, J. and Tridimas, T. (eds) (1998b) New directions in European public law. Oxford: Hart Pub.
Beck, G. (no date) ‘The Lisbon Judgment of the German Constitutional Court, the Primacy of EU Law and the Problem of Kompetenz-Kompetenz: A Conflict between Right and Right in Which There is No Praetor’, European Law Journal, 17(4), pp. 470–494. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2011.00559.x.
Belling, V. (no date) ‘Supranational Fundamental Rights or Primacy of Sovereignty?’, European Law Journal, 18(2), pp. 251–268. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2011.00596.x.
Berki, G. (2018) Free movement of patients in the E.U.: a patient’s perspective. [S.l.]: Intersentia.
Betlem, G. (no date) ‘The Doctrine of Consistent Interpretation: Managing Legal Uncertainty’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 22(3), pp. 397–418. Available at: https://ezproxy.sussex.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/3600652.
Beutler, B. (2009) ‘State liability for breaches of Community law by national courts: Is the requirement of a manifest infringement of the applicable law an insurmountable obstacle?’, Common Market Law Review, 46(3), pp. 773–804. Available at: https://kluwerlawonline-com.ezproxy.sussex.ac.uk/JournalArticle/Common+Market+Law+Review/46.3/COLA2009033.
Beutler, Björn (no date) ‘State liability for breaches of Community law by national courts: Is the requirement of a manifest infringement of the applicable law an insurmountable obstacle?’, Common Market Law Review, 46(3), pp. 773–804. Available at: https://kluwerlawonline-com.sussex.idm.oclc.org/JournalArticle/Common+Market+Law+Review/46.3/COLA2009033.
von Bogdandy, A. and Schill, S.W. (2011) ‘Overcoming absolute primacy: Respect for national identity under the Lisbon Treaty’, Common Market Law Review, 48(Issue 5), pp. 1417–1453. Available at: https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2011057.
Breuer, M. (2004) ‘State liability for judicial wrongs and Community law: the case of Gerhard Kobler v Austria’, European Law Review, 29(2), pp. 243–254. Available at: http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.
British Institute of International and Comparative Law and Rijksuniversiteit te Leiden. Europa Instituut (no date) ‘Common Market Law Review’. Available at: http://www.kluwerlawonline.com/toc.php?area=Journals&mode=bypub&level=4&values=Journals~~Common+Market+Law+Review.
Broberg, M. (2008a) ‘Acte clair revisited: Adapting the acte clair criteria to the demands of the times’, Common Market Law Review, 45(5), pp. 1383–1397. Available at: https://kluwerlawonline-com.sussex.idm.oclc.org/JournalArticle/Common+Market+Law+Review/45.5/COLA2008095.
Broberg, M. (2008b) ‘Acte clair revisited: Adapting the acte clair criteria to the demands of the times’, Common Market Law Review, 45(5), pp. 1383–1397. Available at: https://kluwerlawonline-com.sussex.idm.oclc.org/JournalArticle/Common+Market+Law+Review/45.5/COLA2008095.
Büchs, M. (no date) ‘How Legitimate is the Open Method of Co-ordination?’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 46(4), pp. 765–786. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2008.00804.x.
de Búrca, G. and Weiler, J.H.H. (eds) (2001) The European Court of Justice. Oxford University Press.
Buzek, J. (no date) ‘State of the Union: Three Cheers for the Lisbon Treaty and Two Warnings for Political Parties’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 49, pp. 7–18. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2011.02190.x.
Cabral, P. and Chaves, M.C. (2006) ‘Member State Liability for Decisions of National Courts Adjudicating at Last Instance’, Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, (13), pp. 109–126. Available at: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/maastje13&id=109.
Caranta, R. (no date) ‘Judicial protection against Member States: a new jus commune takes shape’, Common Market law review, 32(3), pp. 703–706. Available at: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=6feecc05-2646-e711-80cb-005056af4099.
Cass, D.Z. (no date) ‘The Word that Saves Maastricht? The Principle of Subsidiarity and the Division of Powers within the European Community’, Common Market Law Review, 29(6), pp. 1107–1136. Available at: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=2fd1d460-0bd1-e711-80cd-005056af4099.
Castillo de la Torre, F. (2005) ‘Tribunal Constitucional (Spanish Constitutional Court), Opinion 1/2004 of 13 December 2004, on the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe’, Common Market Law Review, 42(Issue 4), pp. 1169–1202. Available at: https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2005033.
Chalmers, D. (2005) ‘Editorial: Constitutional modesty’, European Law Review, 30(4). Available at: http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.
Chalmers, D., Davies, G. and Monti, G. (2014) European Union law: text and materials. Third edition. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Communication department of the European Commission (ed.) (no date) History of the EU, EUROPA. Available at: https://european-union.europa.eu/principles-countries-history/history-eu_en.
Conway, G. (no date a) ‘Recovering a Separation of Powers in the European Union’, European Law Journal, 17(3), pp. 304–322. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2011.00552.x.
Conway, G. (no date b) ‘Recovering a Separation of Powers in the European Union’, European Law Journal, 17(3), pp. 304–322. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2011.00552.x.
Cooper, I. (no date) ‘The Watchdogs of Subsidiarity: National Parliaments and the Logic of Arguing in the EU’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 44(2), pp. 281–304. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2006.00623.x.
Coppel, J. and O’Neill, A. (no date) ‘The European Court of Justice: taking rights seriously?’, Legal Studies, 12(2), pp. 227–239. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-121X.1992.tb00467.x.
Craig, P. (2008) ‘The Treaty of Lisbon, process, architecture and substance’, European Law Review, 33(2), pp. 137–166. Available at: http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.
Craig, P. (2009a) ‘The legal effect of Directives: policy, rules and exceptions’, European Law Review, 34(3). Available at: http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.
Craig, P. (2009b) ‘The legal effect of Directives: policy, rules and exceptions’, European Law Review, 34(3). Available at: http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.
Craig, P. (2009c) ‘The legal effect of Directives: policy, rules and exceptions’, European Law Review, 34(3). Available at: http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.
Craig, P. (2011a) ‘The ECJ and ultra vires action: A conceptual analysis’, Common Market Law Review, 48(2), pp. 395–437. Available at: http://www.kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=COLA2011018.
Craig, P. (2011b) ‘The ECJ and ultra vires action: A conceptual analysis’, Common Market Law Review, 48(Issue 2), pp. 395–437. Available at: https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2011018.
Craig, P. (2011c) ‘The European Union Act 2011: Locks, limits and legality’, Common Market Law Review, 48(Issue 6), pp. 1915–1944. Available at: https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2011074.
Craig, P. (no date a) ‘Subsidiarity: A Political and Legal Analysis’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 50, pp. 72–87. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2011.02228.x.
Craig, P. (no date b) ‘Subsidiarity: A Political and Legal Analysis’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 50, pp. 72–87. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2011.02228.x.
Craig, P.P. (1997) ‘Directives: direct effect, indirect effect and the construction of national legislation’, European Law Review, 22(6). Available at: http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.
Craig, P.P. and De Búrca, G. (eds) (2011a) The evolution of EU law. Second edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=694179&site=ehost-live.
Craig, P.P. and De Búrca, G. (eds) (2011b) The evolution of EU law. Second edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Craig, P.P. and De Búrca, G. (eds) (2011c) The evolution of EU law. Second edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=694179&site=ehost-live.
Craig, P.P. and De Búrca, G. (eds) (2011d) The evolution of EU law. Second edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Craig, P.P. and De Búrca, G. (eds) (2011e) The evolution of EU law. Second edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=694179&site=ehost-live.
Craig, P.P. and De Búrca, G. (eds) (2011f) The evolution of EU law. Second edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Craig, P.P. and De Búrca, G. (eds) (2011g) The evolution of EU law. Second edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=694179&site=ehost-live.
Craig, P.P. and De Búrca, G. (eds) (2011h) The evolution of EU law. Second edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Craig, P.P. and De Búrca, G. (eds) (2011i) The evolution of EU law. Second edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=694179&site=ehost-live.
Craig, P.P. and De Búrca, G. (eds) (2011j) The evolution of EU law. Second edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Craig, P.P. and De Búrca, G. (eds) (2011k) The evolution of EU law. Second edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=694179&site=ehost-live.
Craig, P.P. and De Búrca, G. (eds) (2011l) The evolution of EU law. Second edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Craig, P.P. and De Búrca, G. (eds) (2011m) The evolution of EU law. Second edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=694179&site=ehost-live.
Craig, P.P. and De Búrca, G. (eds) (2011n) The evolution of EU law. Second edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Craig, P.P. and De Búrca, G. (eds) (2011o) The evolution of EU law. Second edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=694179&site=ehost-live.
Craig, P.P. and De Búrca, G. (eds) (2011p) The evolution of EU law. Second edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Craig, Paul P and De Búrca, G. (2015a) EU law: text, cases, and materials. Sixth. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Craig, Paul P and De Búrca, G. (2015b) EU law: text, cases, and materials. Sixth. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Craig, Paul P and De Búrca, G. (2015c) EU law: text, cases, and materials. Sixth. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Craig, P. P. and De Búrca, G. (2015a) EU law: text, cases, and materials. Sixth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Craig, P. P. and De Búrca, G. (2015b) EU law: text, cases, and materials. Sixth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Craig, P. P. and De Búrca, G. (2015c) EU law: text, cases, and materials. Sixth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Craig, P. P. and De Búrca, G. (2015d) EU law: text, cases, and materials. Sixth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Craig, P. P. and De Búrca, G. (2015e) EU law: text, cases, and materials. Sixth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Craig, P. P. and De Búrca, G. (2015f) EU law: text, cases, and materials. Sixth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Crespy, A. and Gajewska, K. (no date) ‘New Parliament, New Cleavages after the Eastern Enlargement? The Conflict over the Services Directive as an Opposition between the Liberals and the Regulators’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 48(5), pp. 1185–1208. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02109.x.
Cygan, A. (2011a) ‘The parliamentarisation of EU decision-making? The impact of the Treaty of Lisbon on national parliaments’, European Law Review, 36(4), pp. 480–499. Available at: http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.
Cygan, A. (2011b) ‘The parliamentarisation of EU decision-making? The impact of the Treaty of Lisbon on national parliaments’, European Law Review, 36(4), pp. 480–499. Available at: http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.
Dashwood, A. and Arnull, A. (2011a) A constitutional order of states?: essays in EU law in honour of Alan Dashwood. Hart Publishing. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/suss/detail.action?docID=752471.
Dashwood, A. and Arnull, A. (2011b) A constitutional order of states?: essays in EU law in honour of Alan Dashwood. Hart.
Dashwood, A. and Arnull, A. (2011c) A constitutional order of states?: essays in EU law in honour of Alan Dashwood. Oxford: Hart.
Dashwood, A. and Arnull, A. (2011d) A constitutional order of states?: essays in EU law in honour of Alan Dashwood. Oxford [UK]: Hart Pub. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/suss/detail.action?docID=752471.
Dashwood, A. and Arnull, A. (2011e) A constitutional order of states?: essays in EU law in honour of Alan Dashwood. Hart.
Dashwood, A. and Arnull, A. (2011f) A constitutional order of states?: essays in EU law in honour of Alan Dashwood. Oxford [UK]: Hart Pub. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/suss/detail.action?docID=752471.
Dashwood, A. and Arnull, A. (2011g) A constitutional order of states?: essays in EU law in honour of Alan Dashwood. Hart.
Dashwood, A. and Arnull, A. (2011h) A constitutional order of states?: essays in EU law in honour of Alan Dashwood. Hart Publishing. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/suss/detail.action?docID=752471.
Dashwood, A. and Arnull, A. (2011i) A constitutional order of states?: essays in EU law in honour of Alan Dashwood. Hart.
Dashwood, A. and Wyatt, D. (2011) Wyatt and Dashwood’s European Union law. 6th edn. Hart.
Davies, G. (2006) ‘Subsidiarity: The wrong idea, in the wrong place, at the wrong time’, Common Market Law Review, 43(Issue 1), pp. 63–84. Available at: https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2005083.
Davis, R.W. (2006) ‘Liability in damages for a breach of Community law: some reflections on the question of who to sue and the concept of “the State”’, European Law Review, 31(1), pp. 69–80. Available at: http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.
Dawson, M. (2009) ‘The ambiguity of social Europe in the open method of coordination’, European Law Review, 34(1), pp. 55–79. Available at: http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.
Dawson, M. (2011) ‘Three waves of new governance in the European Union’, European Law Review, 36(2), pp. 208–225. Available at: http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.
De Witte, B. (1999) ‘Ch. 27: “The past and future role of the European Court of Justice in the protection of Human Rights” 📖 The EU and human rights’, in P. Alston, M.R. Bustelo, and J. Heenan (eds) The EU and human rights. Oxford University Press, pp. 859–897. Available at: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=c5450f90-c93b-e711-80cb-005056af4099.
Dickson, J. (no date) ‘Directives in EU Legal Systems: Whose Norms Are They Anyway?’, European Law Journal, 17(2), pp. 190–212. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2010.00544.x.
Dimitra Nassimpian (2007) ...‘And we keep on meeting: (de)fragmenting state liability’, European Law Review, 32(6). Available at: http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.
Dinan, D. (no date a) ‘Governance and Institutions: Implementing the Lisbon Treaty in the Shadow of the Euro Crisis’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 49(S1: Special Issue), pp. 103–121. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2011.02183.x.
Dinan, D. (no date b) ‘Institutions and Governance: A New Treaty, a Newly Elected Parliament and a New Commission’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 48(Suppl 1), pp. 95–118.
Dinan, D. (no date c) ‘Institutions and Governance: A New Treaty, a Newly Elected Parliament and a New Commission’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 48(Suppl 1), pp. 95–118.
Dinan, D. (no date d) ‘Institutions and Governance: A New Treaty, a Newly Elected Parliament and a New Commission’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 48(Suppl 1), pp. 95–118.
Dougan, M. (2007a) ‘When worlds collide! Competing visions of the relationship between direct effect and supremacy’, Common Market Law Review, 44(4), pp. 931–963. Available at: https://kluwerlawonline-com.sussex.idm.oclc.org/JournalArticle/Common+Market+Law+Review/44.4/COLA2007095.
Dougan, M. (2007b) ‘When worlds collide! Competing visions of the relationship between direct effect and supremacy’, Common Market Law Review, 44(4), pp. 931–963. Available at: https://kluwerlawonline-com.sussex.idm.oclc.org/JournalArticle/Common+Market+Law+Review/44.4/COLA2007095.
Dougan, M. (2007c) ‘When worlds collide! Competing visions of the relationship between direct effect and supremacy’, Common Market Law Review, 44(4), pp. 931–963. Available at: https://kluwerlawonline-com.sussex.idm.oclc.org/JournalArticle/Common+Market+Law+Review/44.4/COLA2007095.
Drake, S. (2005) ‘Twenty years after Von Colson: the impact of “indirect effect” on the protection of the individual’s community rights’, European Law Review, 30(3), pp. 329–348. Available at: http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.
Eckes, C. (no date) ‘Protecting Supremacy from External Influences: A Precondition for a European Constitutional Legal Order?’, European Law Journal, 18(2), pp. 230–250. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2011.00595.x.
‘Editorial Comments: Delivering justice: Small and bigger steps at the ECJ’ (2011) Common Market Law Review, 48(Issue 4), pp. 987–993. Available at: https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2011040.
‘Editorial Comments: Fundamental rights and EU membership: Do as I say, not as I do!’ (2012) Common Market Law Review, 49(Issue 2), pp. 481–488. Available at: https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2012017.
‘Editorial Comments: Horizontal direct effect – A law of diminishing coherence?’ (2006) Common Market Law Review, 43(Issue 1), pp. 1–8. Available at: https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2006001.
‘Editorial Comments: The post-Lisbon institutional package: Do old habits die hard?’ (2010) Common Market Law Review, 47(Issue 3), pp. 597–604. Available at: https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2010027.
Eilmansberger, T. (no date) ‘The relationship between rights and remedies in EC law: In search of the missing link’, Common Market Law Review, 41(5), pp. 1199–1246. Available at: http://www.kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=COLA2004049.
Eleanor Drywood (no date) ‘Giving with one hand, taking with the other: fundamental rights, children and the family reunification decision’, European Law Review [Preprint]. Available at: http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.
Emiliou, N. (1994) ‘Subsidiarity: Panacea or fig leaf? 📖 Legal issues of the Maastricht treaty’, in Legal issues of the Maastricht treaty. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons Ltd, pp. 65–83. Available at: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=c313c39c-ca3b-e711-80cb-005056af4099.
Estella de Noriega, A. (2002) The EU principle of subsidiarity and its critique. Oxford University Press.
‘European Law Journal’ (no date), 14(6: Special Issue). Available at: https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.sussex.idm.oclc.org/toc/14680386/2008/14/6.
Fairhurst, J. (2016a) Law of the European Union. Eleventh edition. New York: Pearson. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/suss/detail.action?docID=5175070.
Fairhurst, J. (2016b) Law of the European Union. Eleventh. New York, N.Y.: Pearson.
Figueroa Regueiro, P.V. (2002) ‘Invocability of Substitution and Invocability of Exclusion: Bringing Legal Realism to the Current Developments of the Case-Law of “Horizontal” Direct Effect of Directives’, The Jean Monnet Working Papers, 7(2). Available at: http://www.jeanmonnetprogram.org/archive/papers/02/020701.html.
Foster, N. (ed.) (no date) Blackstone’s EU treaties & legislation 2017-2018. Twenty eighth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Georgios Anagnostaras (no date) ‘Not as unproblematic as you might think: the establishment of causation in governmental liability actions’, European Law Review [Preprint]. Available at: http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.
van Gerven, W. (2000) ‘Of rights, remedies and procedures’, Common Market Law Review, 37(3), pp. 501–536. Available at: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=f6213619-f699-e711-80cb-005056af4099.
Giorgi, F. and Triart, N. (no date) ‘National Judges, Community Judges: Invitation to a Journey through the Looking-glass-On the Need for Jurisdictions to Rethink the Inter-systemic Relations beyond the Hierarchical Principle’, European Law Journal, 14(6), pp. 693–717. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2008.00441.x.
Gordon, M. and Dougan, M. (2012) ‘The United Kingdom’s European Union Act 2011: “who won the bloody war anyway?”’, European Law Review, 37(1), pp. 3–30. Available at: http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.
Granger, M.-P.F. (2007) ‘National applications of Francovich and the construction of a European administrative ius commune’, European Law Review, 32(2), pp. 157–192. Available at: http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.
Greer, S. and Williams, A. (no date a) ‘Human Rights in the Council of Europe and the EU: Towards “Individual”, “Constitutional” or “Institutional” Justice?’, European Law Journal, 15(4), pp. 462–481. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2009.00473.x.
Greer, S. and Williams, A. (no date b) ‘Human Rights in the Council of Europe and the EU: Towards “Individual”, “Constitutional” or “Institutional” Justice?’, European Law Journal, 15(4), pp. 462–481. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2009.00473.x.
Griller, S. (no date) ‘International Law, Human Rights and the Community’s Autonomous Legal Order’, European Constitutional Law Review, 4(3), pp. 528–553. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019608005282.
Grimmel, A. (no date) ‘Judicial Interpretation or Judicial Activism? The Legacy of Rationalism in the Studies of the European Court of Justice’, European Law Journal, 18(4), pp. 518–535. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2012.00615.x.
von der Groeben, C. (no date) ‘Aida Torres Perez. Conflicts of Rights in the European Union. A Theory of Supranational Adjudication’, European Journal of International Law, 22(1), pp. 296–300. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chr017.
Hagemann, S. and Høyland, B. (no date a) ‘Bicameral Politics in the European Union’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 48(4), pp. 811–833. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02075.x.
Hagemann, S. and Høyland, B. (no date b) ‘Bicameral Politics in the European Union’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 48(4), pp. 811–833. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02075.x.
Hagemann, S. and Høyland, B. (no date c) ‘Bicameral Politics in the European Union’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 48(4), pp. 811–833. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02075.x.
Harlow, C. (no date) ‘Francovich and the Problem of the Disobedient State’, European Law Journal, 2(3), pp. 199–225. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.1996.tb00026.x.
Harpaz, G. (2011) ‘European Integration in the Aftermath of the Ratification of the Treaty of Lisbon: Quo Vadis?’, European Public Law, 17(1), pp. 73–89. Available at: http://www.kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=EURO2011007.
Hartley, T.C. (1999) Constitutional problems of the European Union. Hart.
Hartley, T.C. (2014) The foundations of European Union law: an introduction to the constitutional and administrative law of the European Union. Eighth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hatzopoulos, V. (no date) ‘Why the Open Method of Coordination Is Bad For You: A Letter to the EU’, European Law Journal, 13(3), pp. 309–342. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00368.x.
Havu, K. (no date) ‘Horizontal Liability for Damages in EU Law-the Changing Relationship of EU and National Law’, European Law Journal, 18(3), pp. 407–426. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2012.00606.x.
Hepple, B. (2001) ‘The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights’, Industrial Law Journal, 30(2), pp. 225–231. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/ilj/30.2.225.
Herdegen, M. (1994) ‘Maastricht and the German Constitutional Court: Constitutional Restraints for an "Ever Closer Union” and Document "Extracts from: Brunner v. The European Union Treaty (Bundesverfassungsgericht)’, Common Market Law Review, 31(2), pp. 235–262. Available at: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=4e45a038-b213-e711-80c9-005056af4099.
Héritier, A. (no date) ‘Institutional Change in Europe: Co-decision and Comitology Transformed’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 50, pp. 38–54. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2011.02226.x.
Herlin-Karnell, E. (2008) ‘The Ship–Source Pollution Case C–440/05, Commission v. Council , Judgment of 23 October 2007 (Grand Chamber)’, European Public Law, 14(Issue 4), pp. 533–544. Available at: https://doi.org/10.54648/EURO2008036.
Hilson, C. and Downes, T.A. (1999) ‘Making sense of rights: Community rights in E.C. law’, European Law Review, 24(2). Available at: http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.
Hinarejos, A. (2011) ‘Integration in criminal matters and the role of the Court of Justice’, European Law Review, 36(3), pp. 420–430. Available at: http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.
Horsley, T. (no date a) ‘Subsidiarity and the European Court of Justice: Missing Pieces in the Subsidiarity Jigsaw?’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 50(2), pp. 267–282. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2011.02221.x.
Horsley, T. (no date b) ‘Subsidiarity and the European Court of Justice: Missing Pieces in the Subsidiarity Jigsaw?’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 50(2), pp. 267–282. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2011.02221.x.
Isiksel, N.T. (no date) ‘Fundamental rights in the EU after Kadi and Al Barakaat’, European Law Journal, 16(5), pp. 551–577. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2010.00522.x.
Israel De Jesus Butler (2012) ‘Ensuring compliance with the Charter of Fundamental Rights in legislative drafting: the practice of the European Commission’, European Law Review, 37(4). Available at: http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.
Itzcovich, G. (no date a) ‘Legal Order, Legal Pluralism, Fundamental Principles. Europe and Its Law in Three Concepts’, European Law Journal, 18(3), pp. 358–384. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2012.00604.x.
Itzcovich, G. (no date b) ‘Legal Order, Legal Pluralism, Fundamental Principles. Europe and Its Law in Three Concepts’, European Law Journal, 18(3), pp. 358–384. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2012.00604.x.
Itzcovich, G. (no date c) ‘Legal Order, Legal Pluralism, Fundamental Principles. Europe and Its Law in Three Concepts’, European Law Journal, 18(3), pp. 358–384. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2012.00604.x.
Jacobs, F.G. (2001a) ‘Human rights in the European Union: the role of the Court of Justice’, European Law Review, 26(4). Available at: http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.
Jacobs, F.G. (2001b) ‘Human rights in the European Union: the role of the Court of Justice’, European Law Review, 26(4). Available at: http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.
Jacobs, F.G. (2001c) ‘Human rights in the European Union: the role of the Court of Justice’, European Law Review, 26(4). Available at: http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.
Jacobs, F.G. et al. (2008) Continuity and change in EU law: essays in honour of Sir Francis Jacobs. Oxford University Press. Available at: http://eu01.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=10395381120002461&institutionId=2461&customerId=2460.
Jacqué, J.P. (2011a) ‘The accession of the European Union to the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms’, Common Market Law Review, 48(4), pp. 995–1023. Available at: https://kluwerlawonline-com.sussex.idm.oclc.org/JournalArticle/Common+Market+Law+Review/48.4/COLA2011041.
Jacqué, J.P. (2011b) ‘The accession of the European Union to the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms’, Common Market Law Review, 48(4), pp. 995–1023. Available at: https://kluwerlawonline-com.sussex.idm.oclc.org/JournalArticle/Common+Market+Law+Review/48.4/COLA2011041.
Jans, J.H. (2007) ‘The Effect in National Legal Systems of the Prohibition of Discrimination on Grounds of Age as a General Principle of Community Law’, Legal Issues of Economic Integration, 34(1), pp. 53–66. Available at: http://www.kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=LEIE2007004.
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) and European Parliament v Council of the European Union (27AD) Immigration policy - Right to family reunification of minor children of third country nationals - Directive 2003/86/EC - Protection of fundamental rights - Right to respect for family life - Obligation to have regard to the interests of minor children, CURIA - Home - Court of Justice of the European Union. Available at: http://curia.europa.eu/juris/liste.jsf?pro=&lgrec=en&nat=or&oqp=&dates=&lg=&language=en&jur=C%2CT%2CF&cit=none%252CC%252CCJ%252CR%252C2008E%252C%252C%252C%252C%252C%252C%252C%252C%252C%252Ctrue%252Cfalse%252Cfalse&num=C-540%252F03&td=%3BALL&pcs=Oor&avg=&page=1&mat=or&jge=&for=&cid=571183.
Kiiver, P. (2008) ‘The Treaty of Lisbon, The National Parliaments and the Principle of Subsidiarity’, Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 15(1), pp. 77–84. Available at: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?page=77&handle=hein.journals%2Fmaastje15&collection=journals.
Kiiver, P. (2011a) ‘The early-warning system for the principle of subsidiarity: the national parliament as a Conseil d’Etat for Europe’, European Law Review, 36(1), pp. 98–108. Available at: http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.
Kiiver, P. (2011b) ‘The early-warning system for the principle of subsidiarity: the national parliament as a Conseil d’Etat for Europe’, European Law Review, 36(1), pp. 98–108. Available at: http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.
Kiiver, P. (no date) ‘The Lisbon Judgment of the German Constitutional Court: A Court-Ordered Strengthening of the National Legislature in the EU’, European Law Journal, 16(5), pp. 578–588. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2010.00523.x.
Kilpatrick, C., Novitz, T. and Skidmore, P. (eds) (2000a) The future of remedies in Europe. Oxford: Hart Publishing. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/suss/detail.action?docID=1750717.
Kilpatrick, C., Novitz, T. and Skidmore, P. (2000b) The future of remedies in Europe. Hart.
Klamert, M. (no date a) ‘Conflicts of legal basis: No legality and no basis but a bright future under the lisbon treaty?’, European Law Review, 35(4), pp. 497–515. Available at: http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.
Klamert, M. (no date b) ‘Conflicts of legal basis: No legality and no basis but a bright future under the lisbon treaty?’, European Law Review, 35(4), pp. 497–515. Available at: http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.
‘Knocking on Heaven’s Door: Fragmentation, Efficiency and Defiance in the Preliminary Reference Procedure’ (2010) Common Market Law Review, 40(Issue 1), pp. 9–50. Available at: https://doi.org/10.54648/5115417.
Komarek, J. (2007a) ‘In the court(s) we trust? On the need for hierarchy and differentiation in the preliminary ruling procedure’, European Law Review, 32(4), pp. 467–491. Available at: http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.
Komarek, J. (2007b) ‘In the court(s) we trust? On the need for hierarchy and differentiation in the preliminary ruling procedure’, European Law Review, 32(4), pp. 467–491. Available at: http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.
Komarek, J. (2007c) ‘In the court(s) we trust? On the need for hierarchy and differentiation in the preliminary ruling procedure’, European Law Review, 32(4), pp. 467–491. Available at: http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.
Konig, T. and Junge, D. (no date) ‘Why Don’t Veto Players Use Their Power?’, European Union Politics, 10(4), pp. 507–534. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116509346780.
Koutrakos, P. (2011) ‘The Court of Justice as the guardian of national courts - or not?’, European Law Review, 36(3), pp. 319–320. Available at: http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.
Kumm, M. (no date) ‘The Jurisprudence of Constitutional Conflict: Constitutional Supremacy in Europe before and after the Constitutional Treaty’, European Law Journal, 11(3), pp. 262–307. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2005.00260.x.
Kunoy, B. and Dawes, A. (2009) ‘Plate tectonics in Luxembourg: The ménage à trois between EC law, international law and the European Convention on Human Rights following the UN sanctions cases’, Common Market Law Review, 46(Issue 1), pp. 73–104. Available at: https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2009003.
La Torre, M. (no date) ‘The Law beneath Rights’ Feet. Preliminary Investigation for a Study of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union’, European Law Journal, 8(4), pp. 515–535. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0386.00163.
Leczykiewicz, D. (2010) ‘“Effective judicial protection” of human rights after Lisbon: should national courts be empowered to review EU secondary law?’, European Law Review, 35(3), pp. 326–348. Available at: http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.
Legrand, P. (1996) ‘European Legal Systems Are Not Converging’, The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 45(1), pp. 52–81. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/761068.
Lenaerts, K. and Corthaut, T. (2006) ‘Of birds and hedges: the role of primacy in invoking norms of EU law’, European Law Review, 31(3), pp. 287–315. Available at: http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.
Lenaerts, Koen (2007) ‘The Rule of Law and the Coherence of the Judicial System of the European Union’, Common Market Law Review, 44(6), pp. 1625–1659. Available at: https://www.kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=COLA2007138.
de León, S.A. (2012) ‘Regions and Subsidiarity in the European Union: A Look at the Role of the Spanish and other Regional Parliaments in the Monitoring of Compliance with the Principle of Subsidiarity’, European Public Law, 18(Issue 2), pp. 305–321. Available at: https://doi.org/10.54648/EURO2012017.
Liisberg, J.B. (2001) ‘Does the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights Threaten the Supremacy of Community Law?’, Common Market Law Review, 38(5), pp. 1171–1199. Available at: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=87cfa6a7-68d3-e711-80cd-005056af4099.
Lock, Tobias (2011) ‘Taking national courts more seriously? Comment on Opinion 1/09’, European Law Review, 36(4), pp. 576–588. Available at: http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.
Lock, T (2011a) ‘Walking on a tightrope: The draft ECHR accession agreement and the autonomy of the EU legal order’, Common Market Law Review, 48(4), pp. 1025–1054. Available at: https://kluwerlawonline-com.sussex.idm.oclc.org/JournalArticle/Common+Market+Law+Review/48.4/COLA2011042.
Lock, T (2011b) ‘Walking on a tightrope: The draft ECHR accession agreement and the autonomy of the EU legal order’, Common Market Law Review, 48(4), pp. 1025–1054. Available at: https://kluwerlawonline-com.sussex.idm.oclc.org/JournalArticle/Common+Market+Law+Review/48.4/COLA2011042.
MacCormick, N. (no date) ‘Beyond the Sovereign State’, The Modern Law Review, 56(1), pp. 1–18. Available at: https://sussex.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/1096572.
Mancini, G.F. and Keeling, D.T. (1991) ‘From CILFIT to ERT: The Constitutional Challenge facing the European Court’, Yearbook of European law, 11, pp. 1–13. Available at: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=d5a4f9a0-dfed-e611-80c9-005056af4099.
Masson, A. and Micheau, C. (2007) ‘The Werner Mangold Case: An Example of Legal Militancy’, European Public Law, 13(Issue 4), pp. 587–593. Available at: https://doi.org/10.54648/EURO2007034.
Mikko, M. (2008) ‘Unveiling the Council of the European Union | Ch 2: “Voting and coalitions in the Council after Enlargement”’, in D. Naurin and H. Wallace (eds) Unveiling the Council of the European Union: games governments play in Brussels. Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 23–35. Available at: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=ab345e06-b313-e711-80c9-005056af4099.
Mitsilegas, V. (2009) ‘The third wave of third pillar law. Which direction for EU criminal justice?’, European Law Review, 34(4), pp. 523–560. Available at: http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.
Morano-Foadi, S. and Andreadakis, S. (no date) ‘Reflections on the Architecture of the EU after the Treaty of Lisbon: The European Judicial Approach to Fundamental Rights’, European Law Journal, 17(5), pp. 595–610. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2011.00568.x.
Muir, E. (2011a) ‘Of ages in – and edges of – EU law’, Common Market Law Review, 48(1), pp. 39–62. Available at: https://kluwerlawonline-com.ezproxy.sussex.ac.uk/JournalArticle/Common+Market+Law+Review/48.1/COLA2011003.
Muir, E. (2011b) ‘Of ages in – and edges of – EU law’, Common Market Law Review, 48(1), pp. 39–62. Available at: https://kluwerlawonline-com.ezproxy.sussex.ac.uk/JournalArticle/Common+Market+Law+Review/48.1/COLA2011003.
Neve, G. de and Prentice, R. (eds) (2017) Unmaking the global sweatshop: health and safety of the world’s garment workers. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press. Available at: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/suss/detail.action?docID=5106180.
Neyer, J. (no date) ‘Justice, Not Democracy: Legitimacy in the European Union’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 48(4), pp. 903–921. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02079.x.
Niglia, L. (no date a) ‘Form and Substance in European Constitutional Law: The “Social” Character of Indirect Effect’, European Law Journal, 16(4), pp. 439–457. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2010.00517.x.
Niglia, L. (no date b) ‘Form and Substance in European Constitutional Law: The “Social” Character of Indirect Effect’, European Law Journal, 16(4), pp. 439–457. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2010.00517.x.
Ortega, L. (2005) ‘Fundamental Rights in the European Constitution’, European Public Law, 11(Issue 3), pp. 363–373. Available at: https://kluwerlawonline-com.sussex.idm.oclc.org/journalarticle/European+Public+Law/11.3/EURO2005029.
Papadopoulos, T. (2011a) ‘Criticising the horizontal direct effect of the EU general principle of equality’, European Law Review [Preprint], (4). Available at: http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.
Papadopoulos, T. (2011b) ‘Criticising the horizontal direct effect of the EU general principle of equality’, European Law Review [Preprint], (4). Available at: http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.
Payandeh, M. (2011) ‘Constitutional review of EU law after Honeywell : Contextualizing the relationship between the German Constitutional Court and the EU Court of Justice’, Common Market Law Review, 48(Issue 1), pp. 9–38. Available at: https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2011002.
Peers, S. (2008) ‘The European Community’s criminal law competence: the plot thickens’, European Law Review, 33(3), pp. 399–410. Available at: http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.
Peers, S. (2010a) ‘Supremacy, equality and human rights: comment on Kucukdeveci (C-555/07)’, European Law Review, 35(6), pp. 849–856. Available at: http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.
Peers, S. (2010b) ‘Supremacy, equality and human rights: comment on Kucukdeveci (C-555/07)’, European Law Review, 35(6), pp. 849–856. Available at: http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.
Peers, S. and Ward, A. (eds) (2004) The European Union charter of fundamental rights: politics, law and policy. Hart Publishing.
Pliakos, A. and Anagnostaras, G. (2011) ‘Who is the ultimate arbiter? The battle over judicial supremacy in EU law’, European Law Review, 36(1), pp. 109–123. Available at: http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.
Prentice, R. and Neve, G. de (eds) (2017) Unmaking the global sweatshop: health and safety of the world’s garment workers. Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Quénivet, N.N.R. and Dadomo, C. (2020) European Union law. Third edition. Saltford: Hall & Stott Publishing.
Rasmussen, H. (1984) ‘The European Court’s acte clair strategy in CILFIT’, European Law Review, 9, pp. 242–259. Available at: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=1086f1b4-f699-e711-80cb-005056af4099.
Rawlings, R. (no date a) ‘Legal politics: the United Kingdom and ratification of the Treaty on European Union: Part 1’, Public Law, pp. 254–278. Available at: http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.
Rawlings, R. (no date b) ‘Legal politics: the United Kingdom and ratification of the Treaty on European Union: Part 2’, Public Law, pp. 367–391. Available at: http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.
Reich, Norbert (no date) ‘Horizontal liability in EC law: Hybridization of remedies for compensation in case of breaches of EC rights’, Common Market Law Review, 44(3), pp. 705–742. Available at: https://www.kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=COLA2007066.
Rittberger, B. (no date) ‘Institutionalizing Representative Democracy in the European Union: The Case of the European Parliament’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 50, pp. 18–37. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2011.02225.x.
Ross, M. (1993) ‘Beyond Francovich’, The Modern Law Review, 56(1), pp. 55–73. Available at: https://sussex.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/1096574.
Ross, M. (2006a) ‘Effectiveness in the European legal order(s): beyond supremacy to constitutional proportionality?’, European Law Review, 31(4). Available at: http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.
Ross, M. (2006b) ‘Effectiveness in the European legal order(s): beyond supremacy to constitutional proportionality?’, European Law Review, 31(4). Available at: http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.
Roy W. Davis (2006) ‘Liability in damages for a breach of Community law: some reflections on the question of who to sue and the concept of “the State”’, European Law Review, 31(1). Available at: http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.
de Ruiter, R. and Neuhold, C. (no date) ‘Why Is Fast Track the Way to Go? Justifications for Early Agreement in the Co-Decision Procedure and Their Effects’, European Law Journal, 18(4), pp. 536–554. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2012.00617.x.
Sabel, C.F. and Gerstenberg, O. (no date) ‘Constitutionalising an Overlapping Consensus: The ECJ and the Emergence of a Coordinate Constitutional Order’, European Law Journal, 16(5), pp. 511–550. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2009.00521.x.
Sabel, C.F. and Zeitlin, J. (no date) ‘Learning from Difference: The New Architecture of Experimentalist Governance in the EU’, European Law Journal, 14(3), pp. 271–327. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2008.00415.x.
Schutze, R. (2007) ‘Dual federalism constitutionalised: the emergence of exclusive competences in the EC legal order’, European Law Review, 32(1). Available at: http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.
Schütze, R. (2009a) ‘Subsidiarity after Lisbon: Reinforcing the Safeguards of Federalism?’, The Cambridge Law Journal, 68(3), pp. 525–536. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197309990183.
Schütze, R. (2009b) ‘Subsidiarity after Lisbon: Reinforcing the Safeguards of Federalism?’, The Cambridge Law Journal, 68(3), pp. 525–536. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197309990183.
Schütze, R. (2015) European Union law. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Schütze, R. (2016) European constitutional law. Second edition. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Scicluna, N. (no date) ‘When Failure isn’t Failure: European Union Constitutionalism after the Lisbon Treaty’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 50(3), pp. 441–456. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2011.02239.x.
Shore, C. (no date) ‘“European Governance” or Governmentality? The European Commission and the Future of Democratic Government’, European Law Journal, 17(3), pp. 287–303. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2011.00551.x.
Shuibhne, N.N. (2009a) ‘Margins of appreciation: national values, fundamental rights and EC free movement law’, European Law Review, 34(2), pp. 230–256. Available at: http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.
Shuibhne, N.N. (2009b) ‘Margins of appreciation: national values, fundamental rights and EC free movement law’, European Law Review, 34(2), pp. 230–256. Available at: http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.
Shuibhne, N.N. (2009c) ‘The reality of rights: from rhetoric to opt-out’, European Law Review, 34(6), pp. 815–816. Available at: http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.
Solanke, I. (no date) ‘“Stop the ECJ”?: An Empirical Analysis of Activism at the Court’, European Law Journal, 17(6), pp. 764–784. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2011.00561.x.
Steering Committee for Human Rights (CDDH) (14AD) ‘Report to the Committee of Ministers on  the elaboration of legal instruments for the accession of  the European Union to the European Convention on Human Rights’, statewatch: monitoring the state and civil liberties in Europe. Council of Europe. Available at: https://www.statewatch.org/media/documents/news/2011/oct/coe-eu-accession-echr-14-10.11.pdf.
Szyszczak, E. (no date) ‘Experimental Governance: The Open Method of Coordination’, European Law Journal, 12(4), pp. 486–502. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2006.00329.x.
‘The scope of application of the general principles of Union law: An ever expanding Union?’ (2010a) Common Market Law Review, 47(6), pp. 1589–1596. Available at: https://kluwerlawonline-com.ezproxy.sussex.ac.uk/JournalArticle/Common+Market+Law+Review/47.6/COLA2010067.
‘The scope of application of the general principles of Union law: An ever expanding Union?’ (2010b) Common Market Law Review, 47(6), pp. 1589–1596. Available at: https://kluwerlawonline-com.ezproxy.sussex.ac.uk/JournalArticle/Common+Market+Law+Review/47.6/COLA2010067.
Thüsing, G. and Horler, S. (2010a) ‘Case C-555/07, Seda Kücükdeveci v. Swedex, Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 19 January 2010’, Common Market Law Review, 47(4), pp. 1161–1172. Available at: https://kluwerlawonline-com.ezproxy.sussex.ac.uk/JournalArticle/Common+Market+Law+Review/47.4/COLA2010049.
Thüsing, G. and Horler, S. (2010b) ‘Case C-555/07, Seda Kücükdeveci v. Swedex, Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 19 January 2010’, Common Market Law Review, 10(4), pp. 1161–1172. Available at: https://kluwerlawonline-com.ezproxy.sussex.ac.uk/JournalArticle/Common+Market+Law+Review/47.4/COLA2010049.
Thym, D. (2009) ‘In the Name of Sovereign Statehood: A Critical Introduction to the Lisbon judgment of the German Constitutional Court’, Common Market Law Review, 46(Issue 6), pp. 1795–1822. Available at: https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2009074.
Tison, M. (2005) ‘Do not attack the watchdog! Banking supervisor’s liability after Peter Paul’, Common Market Law Review, 42(Issue 3), pp. 639–675. Available at: https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2005024.
Toth, A.G. (1994) ‘Is subsidiarity justiciable?’, European Law Review, 19(3). Available at: http://guides.lib.sussex.ac.uk/Law.
Triantafyllou, D. (2002) ‘The European Charter of Fundamental Rights and the "Rule of Law’’: Restricting Fundamental Rights by Reference’, Common Market Law Review, 39(1), pp. 53–64. Available at: https://kluwerlawonline-com.sussex.idm.oclc.org/JournalArticle/Common+Market+Law+Review/39.1/402757.
Tridimas, T. (2001a) ‘Black, White, and Shades of Grey: Horizontality of Directives Revisited’, Yearbook of European Law, 21(1), pp. 327–354. Available at: http://search.proquest.com/docview/1564197523?OpenUrlRefId=info:xri/sid:primo&accountid=14182.
Tridimas, T. (2001b) ‘Liability for Breach of Community Law: Growing Up and Mellowing Down?’, Common Market Law Review, 38(Issue 2), pp. 301–332. Available at: https://doi.org/10.54648/334301.
Tridimas, T. (2006) The general principles of EU law. Second. Oxford University Press. Available at: http://www.loc.gov/catdir/toc/ecip068/2006005363.html.
Tridimas, T. (2015) The general principles of EU law. 3rd edn. Oxford University Press.
Trubek, D.M. and Trubek, L.G. (no date) ‘Hard and Soft Law in the Construction of Social Europe: the Role of the Open Method of Co-ordination’, European Law Journal, 11(3), pp. 343–364. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2005.00263.x.
Van Gerven, W. (no date) ‘Bridging the Unbridgeable: Community and National Tort Laws after Francovich and Brasserie’, The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 45(3), pp. 507–544. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/760680.
Von Bogdandy, A. et al. (2012) ‘Reverse Solange–Protecting the essence of fundamental rights against EU Member States’, Common Market Law Review, 49(2), pp. 489–519. Available at: https://kluwerlawonline-com.sussex.idm.oclc.org/journalarticle/Common+Market+Law+Review/49.2/COLA2012018.
Vossestein, Gert-Jan (no date) ‘Cross-Border Transfer of Seat and Conversion of Companies under the EC Treaty Provisions on Freedom of Establishment’, European Company Law, 6(3), pp. 115–123. Available at: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=5d2bc332-54f4-e711-80cd-005056af4099.
de Waele, H. and Broeksteeg, H. (2012) ‘The semi-permanent European Council Presidency: Some reflections on the law and early practice’, Common Market Law Review, 49(Issue 3), pp. 1039–1074. Available at: https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2012038.
Walker, N. (no date) ‘The Idea of Constitutional Pluralism’, Modern Law Review, 65(3), pp. 317–359. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.00383.
Ward, I. (2009) A critical introduction to European law. 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press.
Wattel, P.J. (2004a) ‘Köbler , CILFIT and Welthgrove : We can’t go on meeting like this’, Common Market Law Review, 41(Issue 1), pp. 177–190. Available at: https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2003075.
Wattel, P.J. (2004b) ‘Köbler , CILFIT and Welthgrove : We can’t go on meeting like this’, Common Market Law Review, 41(Issue 1), pp. 177–190. Available at: https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2003075.
Wattel, P.J. (2008) ‘National Procedural Autonomy and Effectiveness of EC Law: Challenge the Charge, File for Restitution, Sue for Damages?’, Legal Issues of Economic Integration, 35(2), pp. 109–132.
Weatherill, S. (2016) Cases and materials on EU law. Twelfth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Weiler, J.H.H. (no date) ‘Does Europe Need a Constitution? Demos, Telos and the German Maastricht Decision’, European Law Journal, 1(3), pp. 219–258. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.1995.tb00030.x.
Weiler, J.H.H. and Lockhart, N.J.S. (1995) ‘"Taking rights seriously” seriously: The European Court and its fundamental rights jurisprudence – part I’, Common Market Law Review, 32(1), pp. 51–94. Available at: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=6d040b1d-2546-e711-80cb-005056af4099.
Woods, L. et al. (2017) Steiner & Woods EU law. Thirteenth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Young, A.L. (2005) ‘The Charter, Constitution and Human Rights: is this the Beginning or the End for Human Rights Protections by Community Law?’, European Public Law, 11(2), pp. 219–240. Available at: https://kluwerlawonline-com.sussex.idm.oclc.org/JournalArticle/European+Public+Law/11.2/EURO2005020.
Zbíral, R. (2012) ‘Czech Constitutional Court, judgment of 31 January 2012, Pl. ÚS 5/12.  A Legal revolution or negligible episode? Court of Justice decision proclaimed ultra vires’, Common Market Law Review, 49(Issue 4), pp. 1475–1491. Available at: https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2012072.
Ziller, J. (2010) ‘The German Constitutional Court’s Friendliness towards European Law: On the Judgment of Bundesverfassungsgericht over the Ratification of the Treaty of Lisbon’, European Public Law, 16(Issue 1), pp. 53–73. Available at: https://doi.org/10.54648/EURO2010004.